Jackie Beat raped by Santa??!!

Jackie Beat sings her scandalous parody of Santa Baby, in a video by Austin Young!Happy Holidays! Merry Christmas! Jackie Beat is the Greatest drag queen on earth. www.jackiebeatrules.com

ILLEGAL INVASION NEWS

Rep. Russell Pearce Part 1: Toughest Employer Sanction Bill To Stop Illegal Workers Starts Jan 1st
Find out what's going to happen on January 1st to stop illegal aliens working in Arizona and why companies are fighting against the citizens who are hurt by the influx of cheap illegal labor.

Podcast:
http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=54573

Remarks by Homeland Security Secretary Chertoff on 2007 Achievements and 2008 Priorities
http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=55069

State can't afford cost of illegals
http://www.charleston.net/news/2007/nov/27/state_cant_afford_cost_illegals/

VDARE.com’s Editor Joe Guzzardi: La Raza Represents Mexico to Create Hate & Racism in America!
http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=51321

"ILLEGAL INVASION NEWS": State can't afford cost of illegals
http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=55040

AN EXAMPLE OF WHY MEXICANS TAKE LOW WAGES IN AMERICA:

Not So Stupid

A businessman was talking with his barber, when they both noticed a goofy-looking fellow bouncing down the sidewalk. The barber whispered, "That's Tommy, one of the stupidest kids you'll ever meet. Here, I'll show you." "Hey Tommy! Come here!" yelled the barber. Tommy came bouncing over "Hi Mr. Williams!" The barber pulled out a rusty dime and a shiny quarter and told Tommy he could keep the one of his choice. Tommy looked long and hard at the dime and quarter and then quickly snapped the dime from the barber's hand. The barber looked at the businessman and said, "See, I told you." After his haircut, the businessman caught up with Tommy and asked him why he chose the dime. Tommy looked at him in the eye and said, "If I take the quarter, the game is over."

THE REAL TERRORISM IN AMERICA

http://www.phxnews.com/fullstory.php?article=54775

New York Times: "Immigration Contractor Trims Wages"

Hi Gang: I received a link to the New York Times article I have attached from Bruce DeCell last night . Bruce is a founding member of an organization I advise, "9/11 Families for a Secure America." Bruce, as you may know, is a former New York City police officer whose son-in-law was among the many people who were slaughtered when airliners were crashed into the World Trade Center towers on September 11, 2001. Bruce was not the only person to forward this article to me, several other concerned American citizens forwarded the article to me because they recognized what our country apparently is unable or unwilling to recognize, that the processing of applications for immigration benefits represents a potential area of vulnerability to our nation and our citizens. I certainly appreciate having heard from a number of the folks out there because, in addition to being helpful to me, it also is comforting and encouraging to know that our fellow Americans are becoming more aware and concerned about these critical issues. It was once stated that if you want to place a spy into an organization you are best served by putting that spy in the file room of the organization. The fact of the matter i that our government has become addicted to hiring outside contractors to do the jobs that dedicated civil servants used to perform. This may enable contractors who win those lucrative contracts to make money but it means that rather than employing government workers who are working the way up the ladder or at least building equity in the government pension system, you wind up with workers who are simply looking for a paycheck. The work performed by the support personnel at USCIS is not a temporary job. As long as aliens immigrate to the United States and seek various immigration benefits including naturalization, there will be a demand for the jobs done by these employees. Privatization may seem like a good idea to some, but to me, I believe that it makes better sense to employ a dedicated workforce of government employees. The article notes that now that a new company, Stanley, Inc., has been awarded the contract to do the support work for USCIS that they will have to hire employees to replace those who had been previously employed by the old contractor. They may pick up some of the previous employees as their employees, but it would appear that they won the contract by underbidding their competitors. This means that now those who are part of the system that performs critical backroom paperwork and other functions will suffer a pay cut of some $400 per month. I have attached a job offering from the company that is now responsible for assisting in the adjudications process where immigration benefits are concerned. The first question is, "How do you attract and motivate people who will be doing this important work?" This is a question that is apparently being asked by Senator Bernard Sanders of Vermont. Senator Sanders is right on target with that question. Another question that I would want to have an answer to is, "What impact will this salary cut have not only on morale but on integrity?" In considering this question you should also consider that a portion of the workforce will be given a "bonus" if they can boost productivity. I put the word bonus in quotes because the amount of the bonus is the amount of money that was taken out of their salaries in the first place! I am all for getting the "most bang for the buck." Certainly as a taxpayer I want our government's employees and those who are contract employees of our government to be as productive as possible. However, how do you measure productivity? I am willing to bet that the measure of productivity will be how fast the job gets done, not how accurately the job gets done. In a recent commentary I compared the work at USCIS (United States Citizenship and Immigration Services) with an old episode of "I Love Lucy" where Lucy and her sidekick Ethel get jobs at a candy factory where they are supposed to wrap candy. The conveyor belt continues to speed up until the hapless duo find candy flying at them at warp speed! Everyone found that episode to be extremely funny, so much so that when I use that analogy to illustrate the issue when I speak before live audiences, the audience usually laughs heartily. Of course the scene was intended to be hilarious. The situation at USCIS is anything but funny. This represents a threat to national security. Just over one year ago, Senators Charles Grassley of Iowa and Sue Collins of Maine requested that the GAO conduct an investigation into the allegation that in 2005 USCIS had "lost" 111,000 immigration alien files relating to aliens seekinf various immigration benefits including some 30,000 who sought to naturalize. The GAO issued a report confirming that this had, in fact, happened. The GAO report can be accessed at: http://grassley.senate.gov/public/releases/2006/11282006.pdf Senator Grassley issued a press release that can be found at: http://grassley.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&PressRelease_id=6a0ab105-2d8f-4938-bc0d-f8323de205a8&Month=11&Year=2006 The text of the press release follows:
For Immediate Release November 28th, 2006 GAO REPORT INDICATES UP TO 30,000 CITIZENSHIP APPLICATIONS PROCESSED WITHOUT CONSULTATION OF IMPORTANT BACKGROUND MATERIALS
WASHINGTON – Senators Chuck Grassley and Susan Collins today released a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report that says 111,000 alien files (A-files) were missing in 14 United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) offices. The report also says that as many as 30,000 immigrants’ applications to become U.S. citizens were processed despite the missing files.
USCIS is responsible for processing noncitizens’ applications to live or work in the U.S. , either permanently or on a temporary basis, or to become a U.S. citizen. For certain noncitizens, such as immigrants, USCIS creates an alien file, called an A-file, to serve as the primary file for all the noncitizen’s immigration-related applications and related documents. Not only does USCIS staff rely on an alien’s historical A-file to determine eligibility for immigration benefits, but other federal homeland security and law enforcement agencies use A-files during criminal investigations and to determine whether an alien should be removed from or allowed to stay in the U.S.
Senators Grassley and Collins requested the report after the Immigration and Naturalization Service granted U.S. citizenship to a suspected terrorist, without checking his A-file, which had been lost. His citizenship application was therefore approved despite indications in his A-file about ties to a terrorist organization.
“It only takes one missing file of somebody with links to a terrorist organization to become an American citizen. A terrorist can be unsuccessful thousands of times, but we have to be perfect all the time,” Grassley said. “We can’t afford to be handing out citizenship with blinders on.”
“We should remember that some of the September 11th hijackers had come into the country with legal visas but were allowed to get ‘lost in the system’ before they surfaced again to unleash their attack. It is unthinkable that since then, our immigration system still allows a person with known terrorist ties to become a citizen simply because they can’t find the person’s file,” said Senator Collins. “It is imperative to homeland security as well as the immigration and citizenship process, that the government do a better job of tracking all those who are allowed to enter our country and perform thorough and complete background checks before they are allowed to become citizens.”
The Senators said the missing files not only cause great concern for security, but the missing files also cause unnecessary delays for thousands of honest, hardworking immigrants trying to become U.S. citizens.
USCIS manages more than 55 million A-files. The GAO study found that USCIS may not have used A-files in processing 30,000 naturalization applications out of the 715,000 processed in 2005. DHS, which includes USCIS, agreed with the GAO’s recommendations to require A-file users to record whether an A-file was used to process a naturalization application and to correct any identified deficiencies in file tracking compliance As you will have noticed, I have highlighted several sentences that are particularly significant, in my judgement. Over the past several years naturalized citizens have used their status as United States citizens to obtain employment in sensitive jobs that enabled them to spy on our nation. Some have spied for other countries such as China. Others have spied on our nation to aid terrorist organizations such as was the case with FBI Special Agent Nada Prouty of whom I have written a number of commentaries in the last couple of weeks. Clearly the alien who is granted resident alien status and especially the alien who acquired United States citizenship has been handed the keys to the kingdom. When an airplane crashes federal investigators race to the location of the crash for a number of reasons. The most noteworthy is a desire to determine what needs to be done to prevent similar crashes. The purpose of the 911 Commission was purportedly to learn from the mistakes of our government to protect our nation and our citizens from future terrorist attacks. Yet the system by which the keys to the kingdom that immigration benefits represents is apparently being ignored. By making it clear to these private employees that they will be rewarded for moving the system as fast as possible with no incentive to seek to uncover fraud or other such factors, few if any employees will "waste time" concerned about such critically important issues. Additionally, I worry about human nature. People who are under extreme financial pressure who also may well feel disenfranchised might be more likely to become corrupted. Consider what United States citizenship would be worth to a criminal or especially a spy or a terrorists. Also realize that once an employee has accepted a bribe, such employee will be forever fearful of disclosure by the person who provided them with the bribe in the first place. Once such an employee has been "bought" that employee will forever be the property of the person who bribed him (her) in the first place. I want you to consider a quote from the article I have attached below: “The goal is to try to get this work done as efficiently as possible,” said Shawn Saucier, a spokesman for Citizenship and Immigration Services. He said the wage dispute was between the contractor and the employees and did not involve the agency. I want to know what Mr. Saucier spiked his coffee with! His statement reflects a serious disconnect: he is disconnected from reality and he is also convinced that since USCIS does not directly employ the workers at Stanley, Inc., he apparently believes that any issue involving those workers are not the concern of USCIS! What I want to know is who is going to make those employees of Stanley accountable? USCIS seems to believe that they are not involved because those workers are paid for and employed by a private company. I could imagine the management at Stanley similarly saying that it is up to USCIS to provide leadership and motivation! What all of us should be asking is "Who is in charge here?" Additionally I have done a bit of mathematical computation and figured out that if, as the article noted, Stanley, Inc. employs 1020 employees to do the work for USCIS and if Stanley, Inc., receives $225 million dollars for the life of the three year contract that Stanley, Inc., is being paid $73,529.41 per year for each employee. Of course their are benefits that presumably Stanley, Inc., must pay for each employee and each employee may not be earning the same paycheck, but it would certainly seem that in the long run it would be better for the federal government to simply hire employees and make certain that there is no ambiguity as to who is in charge. I am willing to bet that each employee would receive more money than the current contract arrangement calls for. Higher quality employees might therefore be attracted and the higher salaries might translate into better morale and a decreased likelihood that employees might be prone to compromise. Perhaps the government might even save some money by eliminating the "middleman" (Stanley, Inc.). As I have noted in so many of my commentaries and when I have appeared before Congress and other venues, while many people equate the immigration crisis with our nation' porous borders, in reality while the lack of security at our nation's borders represents a serious threat to our nation, it is only one of many critical areas of concern. The adjudications process may seem to be mundane and does not offer the opportunity for dramatic video footage as does the image of illegal aliens charging across our borders or ICE special agents executing search and warrants, providing United States citizenship and even resident alien status to aliens represents a major component of national security. Spies and terrorists certainly understand this basic principle, it is time our nation' "leaders" came to the same understanding! We the People need to make our concerns known to those who allege to represent us in Washington. Democracy is not a spectator sport! Lead, follow or get out of the way! -Michael Cutler-

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/02/us/02immig.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&ref=us&adxnnlx=1196572003-zMyXCphEGfgMSmAK+J4Dzw

The Oklahoma Southern Baptist convention slaps GOD’S FACE!

THE SOUTHERN BAPITST CONVENTION AKA Baptist General Convention Rebels against the laws of GOD and Man.

New Testament:
The Book of Matthew
Mat 22:17 Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not?Mat 22:18 But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites?Mat 22:19 Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny.Mat 22:20 And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription?Mat 22:21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.
Apostasy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy


I demand this subversive corporation be investigated for openly DEFYING GOD’S and man’s laws, considering the fact that most of these churches are getting government grant money that is SUPPOSED to be used for AMERICAN citizens. NOT Mexican citizens! TEASON and SUBVERSION!!! CHURCHES SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO ALLOCATE GOVERNMENT MONEY!!!!

By spreading misery, poverty and dissension amonst the American people I hearby charge the Baptist Convention by conspiring against We The People of the United States of America as well as aiding and abetting criminals. These churches have obviously fallen into Apostasy and are fraudulently receiving government monies under false pretenses. What GOD will do about them, I can only guess.


Baptists Speak Out Against Oklahoma's New Immigration Law
http://news.yahoo.com/s/koco/20071115/lo_koco/14599298
Church leaders are speaking up about Oklahoma's new immigration laws, and the latest group to take a stand is the Baptist General Convention.
They passed a resolution this week stating: "Christians are under Biblical mandate to respect the diving institution of government and its laws. Let it be known that House Bill 1804 related to illegal immigration will not change their ministry to any people."
Although most Hispanics worship in the Catholic church, many also attend services in at Southern Baptist churches across Oklahoma. The Archdiocese of Oklahoma City had already sent a pledge of resistance to Gov. Brad Henry opposing the law, and the local Muslim community did the same thing.
The Southern Baptist Church said they don't "necessarily agree (with) or oppose the new law," but they will continue to minister to anyone inside their church.
"As Christians, that should be our No. 1 focus -- God first, government second. While we will obey the law to the best of our ability, when people come to our church to worship with us, we are not going to ask for proof of citizenship," said Baptist General Convention spokeswoman Heidi Wilburn.
Members at the convention also passed a resolution calling upon Oklahoma Baptists to vote in the 2008 elections based on Biblical values. (This is NOT what the bible says...)


-No one cares if illegals want to hear you preach, but you aid and abet these criminals and you can be sure, you will reap what ye sow..

Congress in tiff over English-only rules

By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press Writer 2 hours, 18 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - A government suit against the Salvation Army has the House and Senate at loggerheads over whether to nullify a law that prohibits employers from firing people who don't speak English on the job.
The fight illustrates the explosiveness of immigration as an issue in the 2008 elections.
Republicans on Capitol Hill are pushing hard to protect employers who require their workers to speak English, but Democratic leaders have blocked the move despite narrow vote tallies in the GOP's favor.
For more than 30 years, federal rules have generally barred employers from establishing English-only requirements for their workers. But Senate Republicans have won passage of legislation preventing the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from enforcing the rules.
House Democratic leaders, meanwhile, have promised Hispanic lawmakers that the language issue is a nonstarter and the resulting impasse has stalled the underlying budget bill, which lawmakers had hoped to send to President Bush this week.
The EEOC has come under assault from lawmakers such as Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., after the agency filed suit earlier this year against a Salvation Army thrift store in Massachusetts that had fired two Hispanic employees for speaking Spanish while sorting clothes.
Supporters of the EEOC regulation — which can be waived if there is a legitimate business or safety purpose to require English — say it protects workers from discrimination based on their national origin, which is barred under the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
"I cannot imagine that the framers of the 1964 Civil Rights Act intended to say that it's discrimination for a shoe shop owner to say to his or her employee, 'I want you to be able to speak America's common language on the job,'" Alexander said Thursday.
"You can have English-only rules ... if in fact that English-only rule is relevant to job performance, safety, efficiency and so on," countered Rep. Charles Gonzalez, D-Texas. "If it is not relevant, if it is discriminatory, if it is gratuitous, if it is a subterfuge to discriminate against people based on national origin — which we know that's what it is — the EEOC doesn't allow it."
The EEOC took on the Salvation Army case because sorting clothes doesn't require speaking English.
"These women had worked at the location for five years sorting donations without any complaints about their conversing in Spanish," EEOC Commissioner Stuart Ishimaru said at a commission meeting earlier this year.
In other cases, the agency has defended workers who complained they weren't allowed to speak their native languages while on their lunch break or in telephone conversations with their spouses.
English-only lawsuits are in fact brought only rarely, the EEOC says. The agency averages just five lawsuits a year for all language-related discrimination issues. The Salvation Army case filed in April is the most recent English-only suit filed. English-only complaints accounted for less than 0.2 percent of all those filed with the agency last year.
In most instances, the EEOC lawsuits are settled out of court, with employers changing their policies and paying relatively modest damages.
"If and when we file an English-only lawsuit — which is rare to begin with — the usual result is a voluntary settlement," said EEOC spokesman David Grinberg. "If you look at the big picture, it's a very small part of what we do here."
In April, however, a geriatric care center in New York City agreed to pay $900,000 to settle an EEOC lawsuit based on an English-only policy that barred Haitian and Jamaican employees from speaking in Creole but allowed Hispanic and other employees to speak Spanish or other languages. The policy was part of a broader discrimination based on their race and national origin.
Alexander successfully attached the English-in-the-workplace provision to the EEOC budget bill on an Appropriations Committee vote in June, with the support of three Democrats — including the panel's chairman, Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia.
In the House, Gonzalez and other Hispanic members narrowly won a vote in July to reject a move to prevent the EEOC from pursuing English-only discrimination cases. But the result was reversed last week on a nonbinding 218-186 vote urging House negotiators on the underlying budget bill to accept the Alexander's language.
Outraged Hispanics said Democratic leaders didn't adequately get members on board for the vote and they have won a promise from Speaker Nancy Pelosi that Alexander's English-only provision will be killed. House-Senate negotiations on the underlying bill have been put off indefinitely.
Alexander says he offered watered-down language to require the agency to give notification in advance when filing cases, but that it's been rejected by House Democrats.
He insists he's not anti-immigrant, but that speaking English is crucial for immigrants to assimilate into society.
"One way to make sure that we have a ... a little more unity that is our country's greatest accomplishment is to make certain that we value our common language," Alexander said Thursday. "And that we not devalue it by allowing a federal agency to say that it is a violation of federal law for an employer in America to require an employee to speak English on the job."



http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071116/ap_on_go_co/english_at_work_2




IT IS THIS BLOGGER'S OPINION THAT Now the American citizens need to go to work on using the courts to punish offending businesses who only hire illegals to get away with underpaying their workers...organize a group, find out what kind of proof you need for a race discrimination suit, get the proof, and KICK BUTT!

I call this invasion of America by Mexico a war. Because it is. The fact that made it crystal clear to me was when I found out that they were quietly and sneakily building Mexican consulate offices and Mexican Chamber of Commerces in many places in America.

They have been building a structure for their own Mexican government inside the U.S.A. They don't care about our laws because they don't EVER intend to obey them. They intend to make us obey THEM.

And they DON'T like us too much. Already you can tell when they break the law to come here.


Find out how many and where these Mexican government offices are and you'll find how close they think they are to conquering America.

Their disrespect for our law is their disrespect for American People-and our Sovereignty. Which is the heart of what makes America great...paid for with our families and friends blood, sweat, and tears. If we lose that, we've been beaten...and we have lost everything anyway.

Now is the time for all good men to come to the aide of their country......

MEXICAN DUAL NATIONALITY PROGRAM
PRESERVATION OF MEXICAN NATIONALITY (Dual Citizenship)
NATIONALITY LAW EXTENDED INDEFINITELY

* It will strengthen links among Mexicans at home and abroad.
* It will allow Mexicans to keep their nationality after adopting another one from a foreign country.
* It will give individuals who may have lost their Mexican nationality, an opportunity to recover it.
The Nationality law which allows the preservation of Mexican nationality, regardless of the acquisition of another nationality or citizenship, is effective as of march 20th, 1998.
This law, which is based upon a constitutional reform approved unanimously by the Mexican Congress on December 1996, will allow Mexicans who live abroad and decide to adopt a foreign nationality or citizenship, to keep their Mexican nationality. It will also allow those individuals who were originally Mexicans and are now citizens of another country, to regain Mexican nationality.
1.- Background
The Mexican provisions regarding nationality, in effect over the last decades, stated that any Mexican who obtained another nationality would lose their Mexican nationality.
This has implied that Mexicans living abroad have had a face a dilemma regarding naturalization: on the one hand, if they became naturalized in their host countries in order to improve their migratory and legal status, they lost their Mexican nationality and all of their rights. On the other hand, if they did not obtain another nationality so as to retain the Mexican one, they were unable to fully exercise their rights in their host country.
In order to find a solution to this matter, on December 10, 1996, the Mexican Congress approved President Ernesto Zedillo's initiative regarding Articles 30, 32 and 37 of the Constitution which allows Mexicans to preserve their nationality, regardless of acquisition of another nationality or citizenship.
These reforms will also allow those Mexicans who are already citizens of another country to regain Mexican nationality.
2.- Who may benefit from this amendment
Mexicans living abroad, and willing to be naturalized as citizens of their host country, will be able to obtain that nationality while preserving the Mexican one.
Mexicans who have already acquired another nationality will be able to regain the Mexican one. Children of Mexicans at birth or naturalized will be able to acquire Mexican nationality.
For those Mexicans who have lost their nationality, there will be a period of five years, beginning the day of the entry into force of the amendment, in which they may recover it. The procedure of the followed is ready to be implemented as of March 20, 1998 and its simplicity and efficacy are ensured.
3.- Main benefits
The constitutional reforms and the new law provide the necessary legal framework to the principle of "Non-forfeit of Mexican Nationality", a long awaited demand be Mexicans living abroad. These Mexicans communities have long wished to preserve the rights the Mexican Constitution grants to its nationals and to maintain cultural and family ties with Mexico.
Mexicans living abroad will be free to travel and live in Mexico whenever they wish to do so, without having to comply with complicated formalities or apply for permits required for foreigners.
They will be able to buy land without any of the restrictions applied for foreigners. Likewise, none of the restrictions regarding inheritance and employment, concerning foreigners, can be applied.
Mexicans who regain nationality will continue to pay taxes in the country where they reside and earn income.
Mexicans living abroad will not be required to serve in the Mexican armed forces. They will only be required to register at the age of 18, either in Mexico or at its consulates or embassies.
4.- Implications on Voting Rights
Unlike other countries, Mexican legislation establishes a distinction between nationality and citizenship. Nationality refers to how people feel they belong to their country. Nationality is based on one's place of birth and the origins on one's parents. Citizenship implies nationality, as well as, the exercising of political rights which are acquired upon reaching legal age and residence among other requisites. The constitutional reform only modifies provisions related to nationality.
This amendment is not related in any way with the right to vote. So far, no Mexican living abroad is able to vote in any election held in Mexican territory.
Voting is related with citizenship. Thus, the possibility of eventually voting abroad is being separately analyzed and, in any case, would be regulated by The Federal Code of Electoral Institutions and Procedures. Thus, the nationality constitutional amendment and law do not affect voting matters.
DECLARATION OF MEXICAN NATIONALITY
The Mexican Government is granting the opportunity to people of Mexican decent who are naturalized citizens or citizen by birth of another country, to recover their Mexican Nationality.
To obtain the Declaration of Mexican Nationality, the interested party must meet the following:
REQUIREMENTS
Be at least 18 years of age and of sound mind.
Complete the application at the Mexican Consulate.
Present the following documents in original and two photocopies:
If the person was born in United States:
A Certified copy of the Birth Certificate, apostilled by the Secretary of State of the issuing authority.
Original or certified copies of the Mexican father or mother's birth certificate.
If the person was born in Mexico
Original or certified copy of the birth certificate.
Married women need to present the marriage certificate.
Document that proves the U.S. citizenship (i.e. passport or Certificate of Naturalization).
Official picture ID (i.e. Driver's license, passport, California ID, etc.)
Two-passport size photos.
This is a toll free process; the Mexican Consulate is the only autorizated institution to complete it. Upon receiving the Declaration of Mexican Nationality, a $14.00 fee will be assessed.
http://www.aztlan.net/dualcit.htm
THIS PAGE ALSO LISTS ALL THE CONSULATES AND WHERE THEY HAVE INFILTERATED, ABOUT 42 PLACES.
List of Mexican Consulates in the United Statesand Location Maps
http://www.aztlan.net/dualcit.htm

WAR ON AMERICANS

http://www.adversity.net/c25_tbd.htm

Straight from the EEOC's Mouth:
" Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects individuals against employment discrimination on the basis of race and color as well as national origin, sex, or religion." (Even if you happen to be a non-minority!)
" It is unlawful to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of his/her race or color in regard to hiring, termination, promotion, compensation, job training, or any other term, condition, or privilege of employment."
"Requesting pre-employment information which discloses or tends to disclose an applicant's race suggests that race will be unlawfully used as a basis for hiring."

A HAUNTED GOOD TIME...

The Bates Motel and Haunted Hayride










WHOO-HOO!

PANDERING AND BULLSHIT

Democratic Pandering to the Middle Class

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/10/democratic_pandering_to_the_mi.html


MY Thoughts:


LOL! That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard! There IS NO middle class in America today. Rich crooks are destroying it, like the stock market and insurance co. parasites not to mention not to mention multi-nationals who ship our jobs out and steal the money that should go to OUR own people. They call it 'corporate welfare'. They also pocket the monies they get and the exemptions they get from our gov. to institute and maintain safety standards. What a joke! Who do you think you're fooling???



AND IN OTHER NEWS:


Poll: Bullshit Is Most Important Issue For 2008 Voters

Poll: Bullshit Is Most Important Issue For 2008 Voters

WHO DOES AMERICA REALLY BELONG TO?

A video of the early settlers in America.

Once, America seemed endless....wide open prairies, deep forests, mountains that climbed into the clouds. But now, everyday, the land is shrinking. It is a sad reality that nothing on this earth is unlimited. Now our cities are becoming overcrowded. Increasingly the working and development of our lands are forcing wild creatures into our cities to search for survival. My ancestors worked their fingers to the bone to make a home and a way of life for their families. Their blood, sweat, and tears have soaked into the very soil of America. And we may have been poor, but we had DIGNITY. I have the red dirt of Oklahoma running through my veins...
Homestead National Monument of America
Beatrice, Nebraska
http://www.nps.gov/home

AMERICANS REMEMBERING THEIR ROOTS-PT1 OF 2

AMERICANS REMEMBERING THEIR ROOTS PT2 OF 2

THERE WERE NONE OF THESE PEOPLE HERE AT THAT TIME:

WHAT WILL OUR SOLDIERS THINK WHEN THEY COME HOME TO FIND WE HAVE LOST OUR COUNTRY WHILE THEY WERE GONE AND SEE THIS?

THIS IS WHAT A COUNTRY LOOKS LIKE THAT'S UNDER ATTACK.

AMERICAN PEOPLE ON THE MOVE-KUDOS!!!

The American People WILL Prevail!

STUDENT TASERED FOR ASKING SEN KERRY ABOUT VOTER SUPPRESSION

THESE ARE THE REAL 'CHRISTIANS', IF YOU ASK ME...

BACKSTABBING BANKERS

My dad was a businessman at one time who ran a gas station. He always told us: Keep your money in the community, and don't buy anything you can't pay for outright. When credit card companies started, people generally ONLY used them for emergencies. Now it seems Americans have gone mad....they tell us spend! Spend! Spend! And then they put us down for not being able to save any money. Seems we're damned if we do, and damned if we don't. The poor are living in a depression while they rich can afford any perversion.

"Maxed Out" Pt.1/4

COUNTRY FOLK COME AND SEE...

Auctioneer ~ Mike Anderson

SUGAR BEE

SOMETHING DIFFERENT

The Wheels Turning In A Mad-Man's Mind

I believe this is pretty much self-explanatory.

These pics were taken in the backroom of a house in Neb.

They say the guy that painted these was locked into his house

The windows were boarded up and I helped open a window

that had seven different windows and a huge nail.

(p.s. must view original post to view pixs from some sites.)



















WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Hard Times Hit Wal-Mart [Wall Street Journal]

Mr. Zamorano's plight presents a challenge to Wal-Mart Stores Inc. on both sides of the U.S.-Mexican border. The world's biggest retailer by sales has increasingly relied on purchases by Hispanic shoppers both in the U.S. and in Mexico to fuel its sales growth.







Mike Ivey: Wal-Mart tax dodge just business as usual



The front page reports that Wal-Mart owes nearly $18 million in back taxes to the state of Wisconsin is infuriating -- but hardly a new story......



http://www.madison.com/tct/opinion/column/ivey/207502

The Highway to Serfdom

http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2007/08/highway-to-serfdom.html









Never consent to a police search, for any reason.Never admit to a police officer that you are carrying large amounts of cash. Always assume that a police officer would make the same use of that information that would be made by any other armed and potentially violent individual: He would find some way to steal your money......












Know Your Rights

Pearl Jam - Know Your Rights

U.S. flag?

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/s_524040.html

By Chris TogneriTRIBUNE-REVIEWSaturday, August 25, 2007
Tanya Williams hates to buy Chinese-manufactured goods.
But like many American parents, she believes she has little choice.
"It's very hard to find American-made," Williams, 36, of Aspinwall, said as she walked out of the Wal-Mart at Waterworks Mall with her three children. "You don't know whether it's lead-free. I've been looking at the labels, but they don't say."
Williams' concerns are common and legitimate, consumer advocacy analysts said, particularly as global backlash mounts against China due to a surge of recalled, potentially toxic exports. .....

(I-Just say, "NO" to China and the U.S. Businesses who support this communist country!)

LET THERE BE TRUE DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA!

Instant Runoff Voting

AND ABOLISH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE

Father And Son Conversation

A father was having trouble getting his son to cut his long hair. When the boy asked to borrow the family car.The father said, "You may borrow the car when you cut your hair."Later that same evening the father passed by the son's room where he was stretched out on the bed reading the Bible.He said, "Dad, did you know it says here that Jesus never cut his hair?"His dad said, "Yes, son, and if you read further, you notice it says he walked everywhere he went."

CHECK IT OUT!

DEATH TO THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND AND ALL THE BLOODY BRITISH!!!

THE DEVIL

Is this why Georgia burnt up? Enjoy!

THE GREAT TRASH-CAN DEBATE IN OKC,OK

Trash-can fight

MICK CORNETT NEEDS REPLACED EVERY BIT AS MUCH AS OUR TRASH-CAN!

AMERICAN MERCHANTS OF DEATH: YOUR DOCTOR

MAKING MONEY OFF AMERICAN'S SICKNESS, SUFFERING, AND MISERY......












TIME TO DEMAND REGULATION OF THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY!

Post Claim

Technorati Profile

Ready for the Times to Get Better

Crystal Gayle - Don't It Make My Brown Eyes Blue (1978)

JUST SOME MUSIC

Dwight Yoakam - Pocket Of A Clown

Lay down Sally

HAVE A GREAT DAY!

MEDIA LIARS

http://www.cleanupge.org/

Jack Says: "The word 'dump' is used! We didn't dump! We had a permit from the U.S. government and the State of New York to do exactly what we did. Do you think I'd come to work in a company that would do that or condone that? I wouldn't do it, Lesley! This is nuts!" -- Jack Welch's response to Lesley Stahl's question about GE's pollution of the Hudson River (CBS News Transcripts, 60 MINUTES, October 29, 2000)

http://www.ketupa.net/nbc.htm

introductionNBC - now the centrepiece of NBC Universal - embodies the history of US commercial broadcasting and what critics have characterised as the media-industrial complex. It is currently controlled by the sprawling engineering and financial services conglomerate General Electric (GE).
It was spawned by RCA, created by General Electric and Westinghouse during the 1920s 'radio boom' that was a precursor of the dot com fever at the end of the millennium. RCA expanded into film (through RKO) and boasted two major radio networks, one relinquished under federal government pressure to form what became ABC. RCA followed a similar trajectory to GE and Westinghouse, becoming an increasingly unwieldy conglomerate.
In the early 1980s three networks - ABC, CBS and NBC - accounted for around 92% of US television viewers. AT&T ('Ma Bell') controlled 78% of local telephone service and around 98% of the long distance market. IBM accounted for 77% of the computer market. How the world has changed, and not just because of the web.
RCA, having fended off Disney, was absorbed by GE in 1985 to gain NBC - an operation at once more exciting and potentially lucrative than bashing metal. In 2003 GE formed a joint venture - NBC Universal - that encompassed the US film studio, theme park and cable tv interests of Vivendi Universal. At that time GE had revenue of around US$135 billion and assets of US$575bn, with around 315,000 employees in over 100 nations. It ranked as the 5th largest US company by sales and the 8th largest in the world. A chronology of NBC, RCA, RKO and GE is here.

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1254

Extra! November/December 1994Felons On The Air: Does GE's Ownership of NBC Violate the Law?NBC Brings Good Things to GEBy Sam Husseini
General Electric's ownership of the NBC TV network has been in the news in recent months. As Extra! went to press, companies like Time Warner, Disney, ITT and Turner Broadcasting have reportedly been negotiating to either buy NBC outright or enter into some kind of partnership with GE. But a little-noted aspect of communications law raises questions about GE'sownership of NBC's broadcast licenses -- and its ability to sell those licenses to another company.Shady CharactersThe Federal Communications Act of 1934 created the Federal Communications Commission to regulate the airwaves, which are considered public property. The act states that the FCC should assess the "character...of the applicant to operate the station," and ensure that the "public interest...would be served by the granting" of a license.Despite a general decline in the FCC's enforcement of the public interest aspect of this law, there is at least one factor that the FCC still considers before granting a license: whether the applicant has committed a felony....

The CFR controls American media

The CFR controls American media

CFR Examples of media lies

CFR media control John D rockefeller

We have some first class- Low class rich people in OKLAHOMA

Shake Senora!

Hey! Jump in the line....rock your body in time...ok, I believe you....

Smell that Coffee!

Now that I have your attention; let us begin. Thank you.