Send The Warrior Angels Dear Lord!

Send The Warrior Angels Dear Lord!
Victory For The Lord And His People

Friday, November 16, 2007

The Oklahoma Southern Baptist convention slaps GOD’S FACE!

THE SOUTHERN BAPITST CONVENTION AKA Baptist General Convention Rebels against the laws of GOD and Man.

New Testament:
The Book of Matthew
Mat 22:17 Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not?Mat 22:18 But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites?Mat 22:19 Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny.Mat 22:20 And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription?Mat 22:21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.

I demand this subversive corporation be investigated for openly DEFYING GOD’S and man’s laws, considering the fact that most of these churches are getting government grant money that is SUPPOSED to be used for AMERICAN citizens. NOT Mexican citizens! TEASON and SUBVERSION!!! CHURCHES SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO ALLOCATE GOVERNMENT MONEY!!!!

By spreading misery, poverty and dissension amonst the American people I hearby charge the Baptist Convention by conspiring against We The People of the United States of America as well as aiding and abetting criminals. These churches have obviously fallen into Apostasy and are fraudulently receiving government monies under false pretenses. What GOD will do about them, I can only guess.

Baptists Speak Out Against Oklahoma's New Immigration Law
Church leaders are speaking up about Oklahoma's new immigration laws, and the latest group to take a stand is the Baptist General Convention.
They passed a resolution this week stating: "Christians are under Biblical mandate to respect the diving institution of government and its laws. Let it be known that House Bill 1804 related to illegal immigration will not change their ministry to any people."
Although most Hispanics worship in the Catholic church, many also attend services in at Southern Baptist churches across Oklahoma. The Archdiocese of Oklahoma City had already sent a pledge of resistance to Gov. Brad Henry opposing the law, and the local Muslim community did the same thing.
The Southern Baptist Church said they don't "necessarily agree (with) or oppose the new law," but they will continue to minister to anyone inside their church.
"As Christians, that should be our No. 1 focus -- God first, government second. While we will obey the law to the best of our ability, when people come to our church to worship with us, we are not going to ask for proof of citizenship," said Baptist General Convention spokeswoman Heidi Wilburn.
Members at the convention also passed a resolution calling upon Oklahoma Baptists to vote in the 2008 elections based on Biblical values. (This is NOT what the bible says...)

-No one cares if illegals want to hear you preach, but you aid and abet these criminals and you can be sure, you will reap what ye sow..

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Congress in tiff over English-only rules

By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press Writer 2 hours, 18 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - A government suit against the Salvation Army has the House and Senate at loggerheads over whether to nullify a law that prohibits employers from firing people who don't speak English on the job.
The fight illustrates the explosiveness of immigration as an issue in the 2008 elections.
Republicans on Capitol Hill are pushing hard to protect employers who require their workers to speak English, but Democratic leaders have blocked the move despite narrow vote tallies in the GOP's favor.
For more than 30 years, federal rules have generally barred employers from establishing English-only requirements for their workers. But Senate Republicans have won passage of legislation preventing the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from enforcing the rules.
House Democratic leaders, meanwhile, have promised Hispanic lawmakers that the language issue is a nonstarter and the resulting impasse has stalled the underlying budget bill, which lawmakers had hoped to send to President Bush this week.
The EEOC has come under assault from lawmakers such as Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., after the agency filed suit earlier this year against a Salvation Army thrift store in Massachusetts that had fired two Hispanic employees for speaking Spanish while sorting clothes.
Supporters of the EEOC regulation — which can be waived if there is a legitimate business or safety purpose to require English — say it protects workers from discrimination based on their national origin, which is barred under the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
"I cannot imagine that the framers of the 1964 Civil Rights Act intended to say that it's discrimination for a shoe shop owner to say to his or her employee, 'I want you to be able to speak America's common language on the job,'" Alexander said Thursday.
"You can have English-only rules ... if in fact that English-only rule is relevant to job performance, safety, efficiency and so on," countered Rep. Charles Gonzalez, D-Texas. "If it is not relevant, if it is discriminatory, if it is gratuitous, if it is a subterfuge to discriminate against people based on national origin — which we know that's what it is — the EEOC doesn't allow it."
The EEOC took on the Salvation Army case because sorting clothes doesn't require speaking English.
"These women had worked at the location for five years sorting donations without any complaints about their conversing in Spanish," EEOC Commissioner Stuart Ishimaru said at a commission meeting earlier this year.
In other cases, the agency has defended workers who complained they weren't allowed to speak their native languages while on their lunch break or in telephone conversations with their spouses.
English-only lawsuits are in fact brought only rarely, the EEOC says. The agency averages just five lawsuits a year for all language-related discrimination issues. The Salvation Army case filed in April is the most recent English-only suit filed. English-only complaints accounted for less than 0.2 percent of all those filed with the agency last year.
In most instances, the EEOC lawsuits are settled out of court, with employers changing their policies and paying relatively modest damages.
"If and when we file an English-only lawsuit — which is rare to begin with — the usual result is a voluntary settlement," said EEOC spokesman David Grinberg. "If you look at the big picture, it's a very small part of what we do here."
In April, however, a geriatric care center in New York City agreed to pay $900,000 to settle an EEOC lawsuit based on an English-only policy that barred Haitian and Jamaican employees from speaking in Creole but allowed Hispanic and other employees to speak Spanish or other languages. The policy was part of a broader discrimination based on their race and national origin.
Alexander successfully attached the English-in-the-workplace provision to the EEOC budget bill on an Appropriations Committee vote in June, with the support of three Democrats — including the panel's chairman, Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia.
In the House, Gonzalez and other Hispanic members narrowly won a vote in July to reject a move to prevent the EEOC from pursuing English-only discrimination cases. But the result was reversed last week on a nonbinding 218-186 vote urging House negotiators on the underlying budget bill to accept the Alexander's language.
Outraged Hispanics said Democratic leaders didn't adequately get members on board for the vote and they have won a promise from Speaker Nancy Pelosi that Alexander's English-only provision will be killed. House-Senate negotiations on the underlying bill have been put off indefinitely.
Alexander says he offered watered-down language to require the agency to give notification in advance when filing cases, but that it's been rejected by House Democrats.
He insists he's not anti-immigrant, but that speaking English is crucial for immigrants to assimilate into society.
"One way to make sure that we have a ... a little more unity that is our country's greatest accomplishment is to make certain that we value our common language," Alexander said Thursday. "And that we not devalue it by allowing a federal agency to say that it is a violation of federal law for an employer in America to require an employee to speak English on the job."

IT IS THIS BLOGGER'S OPINION THAT Now the American citizens need to go to work on using the courts to punish offending businesses who only hire illegals to get away with underpaying their workers...organize a group, find out what kind of proof you need for a race discrimination suit, get the proof, and KICK BUTT!

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

I call this invasion of America by Mexico a war. Because it is. The fact that made it crystal clear to me was when I found out that they were quietly and sneakily building Mexican consulate offices and Mexican Chamber of Commerces in many places in America.

They have been building a structure for their own Mexican government inside the U.S.A. They don't care about our laws because they don't EVER intend to obey them. They intend to make us obey THEM.

And they DON'T like us too much. Already you can tell when they break the law to come here.

Find out how many and where these Mexican government offices are and you'll find how close they think they are to conquering America.

Their disrespect for our law is their disrespect for American People-and our Sovereignty. Which is the heart of what makes America great...paid for with our families and friends blood, sweat, and tears. If we lose that, we've been beaten...and we have lost everything anyway.

Now is the time for all good men to come to the aide of their country......


* It will strengthen links among Mexicans at home and abroad.
* It will allow Mexicans to keep their nationality after adopting another one from a foreign country.
* It will give individuals who may have lost their Mexican nationality, an opportunity to recover it.
The Nationality law which allows the preservation of Mexican nationality, regardless of the acquisition of another nationality or citizenship, is effective as of march 20th, 1998.
This law, which is based upon a constitutional reform approved unanimously by the Mexican Congress on December 1996, will allow Mexicans who live abroad and decide to adopt a foreign nationality or citizenship, to keep their Mexican nationality. It will also allow those individuals who were originally Mexicans and are now citizens of another country, to regain Mexican nationality.
1.- Background
The Mexican provisions regarding nationality, in effect over the last decades, stated that any Mexican who obtained another nationality would lose their Mexican nationality.
This has implied that Mexicans living abroad have had a face a dilemma regarding naturalization: on the one hand, if they became naturalized in their host countries in order to improve their migratory and legal status, they lost their Mexican nationality and all of their rights. On the other hand, if they did not obtain another nationality so as to retain the Mexican one, they were unable to fully exercise their rights in their host country.
In order to find a solution to this matter, on December 10, 1996, the Mexican Congress approved President Ernesto Zedillo's initiative regarding Articles 30, 32 and 37 of the Constitution which allows Mexicans to preserve their nationality, regardless of acquisition of another nationality or citizenship.
These reforms will also allow those Mexicans who are already citizens of another country to regain Mexican nationality.
2.- Who may benefit from this amendment
Mexicans living abroad, and willing to be naturalized as citizens of their host country, will be able to obtain that nationality while preserving the Mexican one.
Mexicans who have already acquired another nationality will be able to regain the Mexican one. Children of Mexicans at birth or naturalized will be able to acquire Mexican nationality.
For those Mexicans who have lost their nationality, there will be a period of five years, beginning the day of the entry into force of the amendment, in which they may recover it. The procedure of the followed is ready to be implemented as of March 20, 1998 and its simplicity and efficacy are ensured.
3.- Main benefits
The constitutional reforms and the new law provide the necessary legal framework to the principle of "Non-forfeit of Mexican Nationality", a long awaited demand be Mexicans living abroad. These Mexicans communities have long wished to preserve the rights the Mexican Constitution grants to its nationals and to maintain cultural and family ties with Mexico.
Mexicans living abroad will be free to travel and live in Mexico whenever they wish to do so, without having to comply with complicated formalities or apply for permits required for foreigners.
They will be able to buy land without any of the restrictions applied for foreigners. Likewise, none of the restrictions regarding inheritance and employment, concerning foreigners, can be applied.
Mexicans who regain nationality will continue to pay taxes in the country where they reside and earn income.
Mexicans living abroad will not be required to serve in the Mexican armed forces. They will only be required to register at the age of 18, either in Mexico or at its consulates or embassies.
4.- Implications on Voting Rights
Unlike other countries, Mexican legislation establishes a distinction between nationality and citizenship. Nationality refers to how people feel they belong to their country. Nationality is based on one's place of birth and the origins on one's parents. Citizenship implies nationality, as well as, the exercising of political rights which are acquired upon reaching legal age and residence among other requisites. The constitutional reform only modifies provisions related to nationality.
This amendment is not related in any way with the right to vote. So far, no Mexican living abroad is able to vote in any election held in Mexican territory.
Voting is related with citizenship. Thus, the possibility of eventually voting abroad is being separately analyzed and, in any case, would be regulated by The Federal Code of Electoral Institutions and Procedures. Thus, the nationality constitutional amendment and law do not affect voting matters.
The Mexican Government is granting the opportunity to people of Mexican decent who are naturalized citizens or citizen by birth of another country, to recover their Mexican Nationality.
To obtain the Declaration of Mexican Nationality, the interested party must meet the following:
Be at least 18 years of age and of sound mind.
Complete the application at the Mexican Consulate.
Present the following documents in original and two photocopies:
If the person was born in United States:
A Certified copy of the Birth Certificate, apostilled by the Secretary of State of the issuing authority.
Original or certified copies of the Mexican father or mother's birth certificate.
If the person was born in Mexico
Original or certified copy of the birth certificate.
Married women need to present the marriage certificate.
Document that proves the U.S. citizenship (i.e. passport or Certificate of Naturalization).
Official picture ID (i.e. Driver's license, passport, California ID, etc.)
Two-passport size photos.
This is a toll free process; the Mexican Consulate is the only autorizated institution to complete it. Upon receiving the Declaration of Mexican Nationality, a $14.00 fee will be assessed.
List of Mexican Consulates in the United Statesand Location Maps

About Me

My photo

Politics have become a religion, I am NOT interested.

Better than T.V.


Blog Archive